|
|
Inscribed fragment.
Inscribed face and rough picked back preserved; broken elsewhere.
On line 1, part of an alphabet reading from left to right, but the individual letters retrograde.
On lines 2-4, another ... 13 June 1935 ... On line 1, part of an alphabet reading from left to right, but the individual letters retrograde.
On lines 2-4, another alphabet in which the "Γ" is written retrograde.
|
Inscribed fragment.
Inscribed face only preserved.
A rectangular cutting at the lower left corner of the inscribed surface, which must date from reuse.
Attic alphabet.
Six lines of the inscription preserved ... Second half of 5th. century B.C ... Attic alphabet.
Six lines of the inscription preserved.
|
Joins with H 184.
Two lines retrograde.
Line 1:-ΑΒΓΔΕ-
Line 2:-ΑΒΓΔΕF-
Two incomplete abecederia, perhaps of teacher and pupil. In the second line the delta resembles a Boiotian or Euboian type, but ... They would retain such letters in their abecedarium, however since they lacked the critical judgment and experience to emend the new alphabet to their own needs. Digamma had no phonetic value in the Attic alphabet, but its presence is explained by Jeffery's discussion.
... It should be noted that digamma kept its place in the developed Attic alphabet because it was used in the alphabetic numeral system of Attica. |
Inscribed fragments.
Property of Athena (?).
Fragment ΝΝ 593 a), inscribed face, left face, and back preserved; broken at right, top, and bottom. The back surface is in two plains, the lower part rough ... a) (Ν 593) 30 April 1936
b) (Υ 24) 15 December 1936 ... Attic alphabet, archaistic.
|
|
|